Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40460862›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2025

Emergence of a novel drinking innovation in an urban population of sulphur-crested cockatoos,

Barbara C Klump, David Walter, John M Martin, Lucy M Aplin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barbara C KlumpCognitive and Cultural Ecology Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell am Bodensee, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3919-452X
David WalterCognitive and Cultural Ecology Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell am Bodensee, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-1985-2779
John M MartinHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2731-9292
Lucy M AplinCognitive and Cultural Ecology Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell am Bodensee, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5367-826X

Funding

Max-Planck-GesellschaftSwiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI)Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spread of innovation has been proposed as a potentially important source of adaptive behavioural responses to anthropogenic change. Yet, while a diversity of urban innovations have been documented in animals, there are relatively few examples of these spreading to form local traditions. One notable example is the 'bin-opening innovation' in sulphur-crested cockatoos (

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCockatoosAnimalsMaleNew South Walesanimal cultureCacatua galeritainnovationparrotsocial learningurban adaptation

Identifiers

PMID40460862
PMCPMC12133349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.