Article in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Jiansong QiuState Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1424-6389
Yang ZhengState Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Fei FanState Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Jinsong ZhengState Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Qiang ZengAdministrative Bureau of Hubei Changjiang Xinluo Baiji National Nature Reserve, Honghu, People's Republic of China.
Zijia XuAdministrative Bureau of Hubei Changjiang Xinluo Baiji National Nature Reserve, Honghu, People's Republic of China.
Qiang GaoAdministrative Bureau of Hubei Changjiang Xinluo Baiji National Nature Reserve, Honghu, People's Republic of China.
Kexiong WangState Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Songhai LiState Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4977-1722
Ding WangState Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Zhigang MeiState Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-1826-9177
Funding
National Key Programme of Research and DevelopmentTechnical Consultation Service Program for Reintroduction of Yangtze Finless Porpoise in Laowan Branch
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Rebuilding the critically endangered Yangtze finless porpoise population: successful release from an · full record | OpenQuestion