ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Intravenous Fluid Bolus Resuscitation Increases Mortality Risk in Malawian Children with Cerebral Malaria.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fluid Resuscitation in Pediatric Cerebral Malaria: Insights from the FEAST Trial and Further Evidence from Malawi.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Fluid Expansion as Supportive Therapy (FEAST) clinical trial determined that African children with impaired perfusion receiving bolus intravenous (IV) fluids had increased mortality compared to children with impaired perfusion not receiving bolus IV fluids. Malaria was common in FEAST enrollees, but no stratified analysis for children with cerebral malaria (CM), a common cause of febrile coma in Africa, was reported. We investigated whether bolus fluid expansion changed mortality risk in children with CM. To evaluate this association, we performed a propensity score matched retrospective cohort study with data collected from 1,674 children with CM admitted to Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Blantyre, Malawi from 2000 to 2018. After matching of participants by covariate balancing propensity score weighting, children who received an IV fluid bolus had increased mortality risk (odds ratio [OR]: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.36-2.71) compared with those who did not. When stratified by admission systolic blood pressure (SBP), children with an SBP greater than 100 mm Hg receiving bolus fluids had increased mortality (OR: 3.15; 95% CI: 1.81-5.48) compared with those not receiving bolus fluids. In children with an SBP ≤100 mm Hg at admission, receiving bolus IV fluids did not change mortality (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 0.91-2.26). Bolus IV fluids are an ineffective therapeutic intervention in children with CM and are harmful in those with normal or elevated admission SBPs. Our results confirm the lack of efficacy and potential harm of IV bolus fluid administration in Malawian children with CM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.