ArticleBioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
MHz compression of pulse packets facilitates remote focusing of electroporation.
Article in Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stimulation by pulsed electric fields (PEFs) normally follows PEF strength and weakens with distance from electrodes. Bipolar cancellation, caused by the electric field reversal, can offset this dependence. Remote focusing can be achieved by stimulation with nanosecond pulse packets that generate multiphasic, bipolar interference patterns near electrodes while preserving unipolar PEF at the remote target. We studied how the packet repetition rate, pulse width, and packet number influence remote focusing of electroporation and its suppression near electrodes. Cell monolayers were electroporated by packets of 300-, 600-, or 900-ns pulses from four needle electrodes arranged in a square with 15.3-mm diagonals. Electroporative dye uptake peaked at the center of the square and decreased laterally following Lorentzian distribution. Higher packet rates, longer pulses, and a smaller number of packets sharpened the central peak, reducing its full width at half maximum (FWHM) to 1.1 mm, which was 7.3 % of the diagonal and just 2.3 % of the electrode array area. At 0.2 MHz, electroporation near electrodes was 40-fold weaker than at the center, despite a 4-fold stronger electric field. This near-complete suppression of off-target effects, combined with sharper remote focusing, provides a critical advantage for precise targeting of PEF effects in biomedical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.