Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40460642›Full record

ArticleGait & posture2025

Effects of carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis stiffness on lower limb motion and loading during gait: A pilot study.

Kirsten M Anderson, Wesley J Gari, Sara M Magdziarz, Molly S Pacha, Donald D Anderson, Jason M Wilken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gait & posture, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kirsten M Anderson1-152 MEB 500, Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States. Electronic address: kirsten-m-anderson@uiowa.edu.
Wesley J Gari1-152 MEB 500, Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States. Electronic address: wesley-gari@uiowa.edu.
Sara M Magdziarz1-152 MEB 500, Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States. Electronic address: sara-magdziarz@uiowa.edu.
Molly S Pacha1-152 MEB 500, Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States. Electronic address: molly-pacha@uiowa.edu.
Donald D Anderson2181 WL, 200 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States. Electronic address: don-anderson@uiowa.edu.
Jason M Wilken1-152 MEB 500, Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States. Electronic address: jason-wilken@uiowa.edu.

Funding

University of Iowa Institute for Clinical and Translational ScienceUM1TR004403 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Marlan R Hansen, Patricia Winokur · 2023 to 2026
$16.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic lower limb injuries can have long-lasting detrimental effects. Carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) are used to improve function, reduce pain, and alter foot loading following such injuries. Most prior investigations in this area have focused on very stiff CDOs designed to return patients back to physically demanding activities, with few studies evaluating more compliant CDOs. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does CDO stiffness influence gait kinematics and kinetics, ground reaction forces, and forces acting on the foot in individuals following traumatic injury.

methodsSeven individuals who had sustained a unilateral distal tibia intra-articular fracture completed testing without an orthosis and in three CDOs of differing stiffnesses (Compliant, Moderate, Stiff). Biomechanical gait data were collected while participants walked at a controlled speed. Instrumented insoles were used to measure peak forces and force impulse for the hindfoot, midfoot, forefoot, and total foot.

resultsSignificant effects on joint kinematics and kinetics were primarily observed at the ankle. All CDOs significantly reduced ankle motion and power compared to walking without a CDO. Moderate and Stiff CDOs both significantly reduced knee flexion at initial contact. All CDOs significantly reduced peak medial and braking ground reaction forces compared to walking without a CDO. Peak hindfoot force was significantly reduced with Compliant and Stiff CDOs. Peak forefoot force and forefoot force impulse were significantly reduced with all CDOs. Large effect sizes were observed for most significant pairwise comparisons. SIGNIFICANCE: Study CDOs similarly reduced ankle motion while allowing greater power generation compared to very stiff CDOs in previous publications. Peak hindfoot force, peak forefoot force, and forefoot force impulse were significantly reduced with CDO use. The limited effect of CDO stiffness on outcomes suggests that more compliant CDOs may be sufficient in individuals where pain with motion and loading is a primary consideration following traumatic injury.

Indexed as

Carbon FiberFoot OrthosesGaitLower ExtremityAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRange of Motion, ArticularWeight-BearingYoung AdultCarbon FiberAFOAnkle Foot OrthosisCarbon FiberGaitTraumatic Limb Injury

Identifiers

PMID40460642
PMCPMC12292510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.