Observational studyJMIR mental health2025
Efficient Online Recruitment of Patients With Depressive Symptoms Using Social Media: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.
Observational study in JMIR mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a transdiagnostic mental health intervention in German primary care: a parallel-group, two-arm, cluster randomised controlled pilot study.BMC primary care · 2026Trial
- A data-driven methodological framework for representative recruitment in psychiatric research: insights from the DOCUMENT study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Development and validation of the SuPr-10 questionnaire for suicidality assessment in primary care patients with depressive symptoms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Comparison of Participant Demographics Across Co-Designed Recruitment Methods to Two Student Mental Health Trials: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- Real-World Evidence Shows Gaps in Awareness, Medical Help-Seeking, and Diagnosis for Primary Dysmenorrhea but Not Premenstrual Syndrome: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver 80% of trials worldwide fail to complete patient recruitment within the initially planned time frame. Over the past decade, the use of social media for recruitment in medical research has become increasingly popular. While Google and Facebook are well established, newer social media channels such as Instagram and TikTok garner less research attention as recruitment tools. Although some studies have investigated the advantages and disadvantages of using social media for recruitment, a considerable gap still exists in understanding the precise mechanisms and factors that make different social media platforms most effective and cost-efficient for patient recruitment in mental health studies.
objectiveThis study evaluates the effectiveness of recruitment strategies implemented during the investigative phase of a validation study for a new suicidality assessment questionnaire optimized for primary care.
methodsWe describe how online recruitment contributed to the enrollment of patients with depressive symptoms for the validation of a suicidality questionnaire (Suicide Prevention in Primary Care), which required over 500 participants. To this end, we analyzed differences in sample demographics between traditionally recruited and online participants, compared advertising metrics and conversion rates, and conducted a cost-benefit analysis.
resultsWe found online recruitment to be a fast and efficient method of securing the required number of participants with depressive symptoms for the study and increasing patient diversity. Considering the distribution of gender, age, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores, participants recruited offline and online were equally eligible for the study. Online recruitment demonstrated high advertising efficiency. For example, the study population responded well to video advertisements on social media; these performed 50% to 70% more cost-efficiently than the best image advertisements. Moreover, a long website copy proved slightly better than a short version. Pixel tracking for improved advertisement targeting reduced advertising costs per suitable participant by 83.3%, making the advertisements 6 times more cost-efficient.
conclusionsSocial media recruitment increased the diversity of patients in the studies and proved suitable for vulnerable and hard-to-reach populations. The total cost per patient recruited online was comparable to that achieved using offline methods, but overall recruitment progressed faster. In this study, implementing video advertisements and pixel tracking resulted in significant cost savings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.