SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025
Internet-Based Interventions for Preventing Premature Birth in Preconceptional Women of Childbearing Age: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreconception health is essential for preventing premature birth, yet engagement in preconception care remains low. Internet-based interventions offer scalable solutions, but their effectiveness in this context is underexplored.
objectiveThis systematic review aimed to describe the characteristics and designs of studies on internet-based interventions and evaluate their effectiveness in preventing premature birth among preconceptional women of childbearing age.
methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies on internet-based interventions targeting premature birth prevention, covering publications up to December 2023 with no language or geographic restrictions. The search, conducted initially in February 2023 and updated in March 2024, followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42021277024). Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Due to heterogeneity in populations, interventions, and outcomes, a narrative synthesis was performed instead of a meta-analysis.
resultsFrom 3437 articles identified across 2 searches, 9 studies were included after excluding duplicates and ineligible papers. Studies, primarily from high-income countries (eg, 4/9, 44% from the United States), varied in design (4/9, 44% randomized controlled trials; 5/9, 56% quasi-experimental) and timing (5/9, 56% post 2020). The overall risk of bias was high in 6/9 (67%) studies, with only 1/9 (11%) rated low risk. Interventions, delivered via websites (4/9, 44%), conversational agents (3/9, 33%), or other platforms, significantly improved reproductive health knowledge in 3/9 (33%) studies but showed no consistent impact on self-efficacy (no effect in 2/3 [67%] studies assessing it). Behavioral outcomes, such as folic acid use and contraception initiation, were inconsistent across 5/9 (56%) studies, with significant effects in short-term (eg, 2/9, 22%) but not long-term interventions (eg, 2/4, 50% at 12 months). No studies directly measured premature birth as an outcome.
conclusionsInternet-based interventions showed mixed effectiveness across reproductive health outcomes pertinent to premature birth prevention, with notable gains in knowledge but limited success in altering behaviors. Given the small number of studies and the prevalent high risk of bias, these findings warrant cautious interpretation. Future research, including robust clinical trials, is essential to develop, evaluate, and disseminate effective and safe internet-based interventions for preconception care.
trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42021277024; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42021277024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.