Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40460420›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Engaging Stakeholders in the Development of a National Digital Mental Health Strategy: Reflexive Thematic Analysis.

Sarah Kennedy, Robyn Fitzgerald, Ruth Melia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah KennedySchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1060-4818
Robyn FitzgeraldPsychology Department, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, Health Service Executive, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5812-3682
Ruth MeliaPsychology Department, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1152-5510

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in digital health technology offer the potential to overcome established access barriers to mental health support, such as stigma and geographical location. The World Health Organization recommends integrating digital technologies into mental health care, underscoring the need for countries to develop national digital mental health (DMH) strategies to guide efforts. The rate of development and availability of DMH tools currently outpaces the existing policy or regulatory guidance required to guide their use. In Ireland, a key requirement of the national mental health strategy, Sharing the Vision, was the development of a national DMH strategy. Key stakeholders in DMH research, policy, practice, and lived experience were brought together as part of a focused stakeholder engagement event to develop a shared vision for digital mental health in Ireland.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the views of DMH stakeholders to set priorities for the development of a national DMH strategy.

methodsForty-seven stakeholders were each assigned to 1 of 6 focused strategy discussion groups. Invited stakeholders included experts in DMH research, clinical practice, and mental health advocacy and policy, together with those with lived experience of accessing mental health services. Qualitative data were analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis approach. Researchers followed the 6-step framework proposed by Braun and Clarke. Reflexive thematic analysis emphasizes intentionality and critical thought, highlighting researchers' deliberate interpretation of data while being aware of how their perspectives shape the conclusions.

resultsA total of 5 major themes were identified: inclusive access, being user-led, trust, education and training, and connectedness. These major themes were related to 15 subthemes. The inclusive access theme comprised inclusivity, accessibility, and early intervention subthemes. The user-led theme encompassed coproduction, choice, and needs-led subthemes. Compelling narrative; regulation, policy, and governance; and evidence base subthemes were identified within the theme of trust. The subthemes of digital literacy, mental health literacy, and transformation were identified within the education and training theme. Finally, the connectedness theme incorporated the subthemes of integration, relationships, and stigma.

conclusionsOverall, delegates viewed digital technology as a potential enabler of accessible and inclusive mental health support. However, it was also seen as a potential barrier to access and inclusion if concerns regarding data privacy, education and training needs, regulation, and the need for a more a robust evidence base were not addressed. Coproduction at all stages was identified as key to reducing access barriers, enhancing inclusion, and maintaining trust. Themes identified informed a follow-on consensus-seeking process to further refine and prioritize the proposed actions of the first national DMH strategy.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyMental HealthMental Health ServicesStakeholder ParticipationHealth PolicyHumansIrelandcoproductiondigital healthdigital mental healthpolicyreflexive thematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID40460420
PMCPMC12174891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.