ArticleJMIR AI2025
High-Throughput Phenotyping of the Symptoms of Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias Using Large Language Models: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Neuroprotective effects of ursodeoxycholic acid in Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2026Review
- AI-enabled resilience modeling for brain health.Frontiers in molecular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) are complex disorders with overlapping symptoms and pathologies. Comprehensive records of symptoms in electronic health records (EHRs) are critical for not only reaching an accurate diagnosis but also supporting ongoing research studies and clinical trials. However, these symptoms are frequently obscured within unstructured clinical notes in EHRs, making manual extraction both time-consuming and labor-intensive.
objectiveWe aimed to automate symptom extraction from the clinical notes of patients with ADRD using fine-tuned large language models (LLMs), compare its performance to regular expression-based symptom recognition, and validate the results using brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data.
methodsWe fine-tuned LLMs to extract ADRD symptoms across the following 7 domains: memory, executive function, motor, language, visuospatial, neuropsychiatric, and sleep. We assessed the algorithm's performance by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for each domain. The extracted symptoms were then validated in two analyses: (1) predicting ADRD diagnosis using the counts of extracted symptoms and (2) examining the association between ADRD symptoms and MRI-derived brain volumes.
resultsSymptom extraction across the 7 domains achieved high accuracy with AUROCs ranging from 0.97 to 0.99. Using the counts of extracted symptoms to predict ADRD diagnosis yielded an AUROC of 0.83 (95% CI 0.77-0.89). Symptom associations with brain volumes revealed that a smaller hippocampal volume was linked to memory impairments (odds ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.84; P=.006), and reduced pallidum size was associated with motor impairments (odds ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.90; P=.04).
conclusionsThese results highlight the accuracy and reliability of our high-throughput ADRD phenotyping algorithm. By enabling automated symptom extraction, our approach has the potential to assist with differential diagnosis, as well as facilitate clinical trials and research studies of dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.