ArticlePloS one2025
Ulnar finger posture effect on a pinch strength.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper extremity position affects maximum pinch strength; however, there is no consensus regarding the posture of the three ulnar fingers during pinch strength testing, and existing studies have different flexion or extension posture, depending on the measurement method used. This study aimed to clarify the effect of ulnar finger posture on maximum pinch strength and to verify its reliability. Thirty-three participants (19 males and 14 females) performed maximum pulp-to-pulp pinching with both dominant and non-dominant hands. Their ulnar finger posture was tested in two positions (flexion and extension). Measurements were conducted on three separate days by two examiners. Pinch strengths were compared for ulnar finger posture, hand dominance, and sex. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to assess intra-rater, inter-rater and test-retest reliability. Pinch strength in the flexion posture was significantly stronger than that in the extension posture, regardless of hand dominance or sex (1.34 times greater). Intra-rater reliability was good to excellent in the flexion posture (0.89-0.92) and moderate to good in the extension posture (0.71-0.89). Inter-rater reliability was moderate for both flexion and extension postures (flexion: 0.64-0.68, extension: 0.52-0.54). Test-retest reliability was good to excellent in the flexion posture (0.83-0.91) and moderate in the extension posture (0.71-0.72). These results indicate the importance of hand therapists instructing patients to flex their ulnar fingers during testing to obtain maximum and reliable pinch strength measurements, thereby enhancing the accuracy of hand functional assessment in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.