ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2025
Does Stem Design for Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty From Previous Short Intramedullary Nail Predispose to Fracture?
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionConversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) from prior short intramedullary nail (IMN) is an increasingly common procedure. Currently, there are no studies investigating if distal interlock screws serve as stress risers contributing to perioperative fractures, or whether primary stems can be used in previously reamed and fractured femurs. We hypothesized that conversion would be successful regardless of stem design.
methodsNineteen patients who underwent short IMN to THA conversion were retrospectively identified from 2013 to 2022, with a mean 13 months between the procedures. Patient demographics, as well as intra- and postoperative variables, including stem design, length of stay, fractures, unplanned readmissions, and revisions, were collected. Mean follow-up was 13 months.
resultsA diaphyseal-engaging revision stem was used in 13 cases, with metaphyseal press-fit stems and cemented stems each used in 3 cases. Two patients (one diaphyseal stem, one cemented stem) sustained intraoperative greater trochanteric fractures. No postoperative fractures were found. Four emergency department visits (21%) and one unplanned readmission (5%) were reported within 30 days, with 1 emergency department visit (5%) and two readmissions (11%) within 90 days. Stratified by stem type, we observed no notable difference in length of stay or procedure length. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to investigate conversion to THA from short IMN. Overall, there were two intraoperative fractures, but no distal fractures or revisions. Although the distal interlock screw was commonly bypassed with a revision-type diaphyseal stem, this was not universal. Further research is needed to determine if primary arthroplasty stem designs can be used in this setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Treatment Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.