ArticlePloS one2025
Improved MPC for trajectory planning of self-driving cars.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Path Planning and Trajectory Tracking Research for Autonomous Vehicles from 2000 to 2025.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To tackle the challenges associated with lane changes in diverse driving environments, this study introduces an Improved Model Predictive Control (IMPC) approach that integrates vehicle state and driving context to execute maneuvers effectively. Initially, a simplified model is established, incorporating vehicle position, velocity, and driving conditions. Subsequently, a Sigmoid function is utilized to restrict vehicle movements, while Finite State Machine (FSM) decision-making selects appropriate maneuvers in real time according to changing driving conditions. In addition, a discrete Simplified Dual Neural Network (SDNN) is utilized to efficiently solve Quadratic Programming (QP) problems, overcoming the slow-solving issue of traditional MPC and ensuring rapid acquisition of longitudinal and lateral accelerations for lane changes, braking, and overtaking maneuvers. Finally, the results from hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) simulation validation indicate that IMPC can efficiently address collision avoidance with surrounding dynamic vehicles across three distinct driving scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.