ArticlePloS one2025
Between-day reliability of local and global muscle-tendon unit assessments in female athletes whilst standardising menstrual cycle phase.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Muscle-tendon unit (MTU) assessments can be categorised into local (e.g., tendon strain) or global (e.g., jump height) assessments. Although menstrual cycle phase may be a key consideration when implementing these assessments in female athletes, the reliability of many MTU assessments is not well defined within female populations. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to report the test-retest reliability of local and global MTU assessments during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Seventeen naturally menstruating females (age 28.5 ± 7.3 years) completed local and global MTU assessments during two testing sessions separated over 24-72 hours. Local tests included Achilles' tendon mechanical testing and isometric strength of ankle plantar flexors and knee extensors, whereas global tests included countermovement, squat, and drop jumps, and the isometric midthigh pull. Based on intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) statistics, poor to excellent reliability was found for local measures (ICC: 0.096-0.936). Good to excellent reliability was found for all global measures (ICC: 0.788-0.985), excluding the eccentric utilisation ratio (ICC 0.738) and most rate of force development metrics (ICC: 0.635-0.912). Isometric midthigh pull peak force displayed excellent reliability (ICC: 0.966), whereas force-time metrics ranged from moderate to excellent (ICC: 0.635-0.970). Excluding rate of force development (coefficient of variation [CV]: 10.6-35.9%), global measures (CV: 1.6-12.9%) were more reproducible than local measures (CV: 3.6-64.5%). However, local metrics directly measure specific properties of the MTU, and therefore provide valuable information despite lower reproducibility. The novel data reported here provides insight into the natural variability of MTU assessments within female athletes which can be used to enhance the interpretation of other female athlete data, especially that which aims to investigate other aspects of variability, such as the menstrual cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.