Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40460162›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Gut microbiota and its influence on the Gut-Brain axis in comparison with chemotherapy patients and cancer-free control data in Breast cancer-A computational perspective.

Tamizhini Loganathan, George Priya Doss C

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tamizhini LoganathanLaboratory of Integrative Genomics, Department of Integrative Biology, School of BioSciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
George Priya Doss CLaboratory of Integrative Genomics, Department of Integrative Biology, School of BioSciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5971-8290

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) continues to be a major cause of cancer-related illness and death among women worldwide. Traditional treatments include surgery, radiation, hormone therapy, and chemotherapy, but these approaches often face challenges due to variability in patient response and adverse effects. This study investigated the relationship between gut microbiome diversity, community composition, and pathway analysis in women undergoing chemotherapy for BC (During Treatment-DT) compared to cancer-free controls (CFC). Using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, the study assessed alpha and beta diversity. Results showed differences in microbiome composition between DT and CFC samples, with Firmicutes being highly abundant in both groups. Core microbiome and correlation analysis at the phylum and genus levels identified significant microbiota. Specifically, the abundance of genera such as Pseudomonas and Akkermansia decreased, while Ruminococcus and Allistipes increased, as determined by statistical and machine learning approaches. Disease associations were examined based on KO abundance, identifying links to conditions such as autism spectrum disorder, Clostridium difficile infection, chronic kidney disease, and multiple sclerosis. Key KEGG pathways enriched in DT and CFC groups included the two-component system, tyrosine metabolism, and the pentose phosphate pathway. Conversely, dysbiosis or the presence of pathogenic bacteria (Ruminococcus) associated with the SOX8 gene could lead to chemoresistance, altered metabolic pathways, and increased toxicity. These findings underscore the potential implications for treatment outcomes and personalized medicine.

Indexed as

BrainBreast NeoplasmsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdultBacteriaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID40460162
PMCPMC12132997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.