ArticlePloS one2025
Gut microbiota and its influence on the Gut-Brain axis in comparison with chemotherapy patients and cancer-free control data in Breast cancer-A computational perspective.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemotherapy-Induced Brain Damage: Mechanisms and Insights from Rodent Models.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and CIPN: State-of-the-Art Evidence and a Microbiota-Ozone Therapeutic Framework.Cancers · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota drives cancer evolution and therapy resistance.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Dynamic changes and clinical significance of the gut microbiota and serum metabolites in breast cancer onset, progression and chemotherapy intervention.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Host-microbiome interactions in breast cancer progression and treatment response.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Chronic stress: a fourth etiology in tumorigenesis?Molecular cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) continues to be a major cause of cancer-related illness and death among women worldwide. Traditional treatments include surgery, radiation, hormone therapy, and chemotherapy, but these approaches often face challenges due to variability in patient response and adverse effects. This study investigated the relationship between gut microbiome diversity, community composition, and pathway analysis in women undergoing chemotherapy for BC (During Treatment-DT) compared to cancer-free controls (CFC). Using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, the study assessed alpha and beta diversity. Results showed differences in microbiome composition between DT and CFC samples, with Firmicutes being highly abundant in both groups. Core microbiome and correlation analysis at the phylum and genus levels identified significant microbiota. Specifically, the abundance of genera such as Pseudomonas and Akkermansia decreased, while Ruminococcus and Allistipes increased, as determined by statistical and machine learning approaches. Disease associations were examined based on KO abundance, identifying links to conditions such as autism spectrum disorder, Clostridium difficile infection, chronic kidney disease, and multiple sclerosis. Key KEGG pathways enriched in DT and CFC groups included the two-component system, tyrosine metabolism, and the pentose phosphate pathway. Conversely, dysbiosis or the presence of pathogenic bacteria (Ruminococcus) associated with the SOX8 gene could lead to chemoresistance, altered metabolic pathways, and increased toxicity. These findings underscore the potential implications for treatment outcomes and personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.