Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40460139›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Perish the thawed? EDTA reduces DNA degradation during extraction from frozen tissue.

Ella Messner, Lev Becker, Mia L DeSanctis, Elizabeth A Soranno, Ryan Pianka, Caileigh Pierce, Molly Johnson, Rosalia Falco Poulin, Hannah J Appiah-Madson, Daniel L Distel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ella MessnerOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Lev BeckerOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Mia L DeSanctisOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0003-7395-4745
Elizabeth A SorannoOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Ryan PiankaOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0006-0835-7612
Caileigh PierceOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0004-7918-9842
Molly JohnsonOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0005-7063-0520
Rosalia Falco PoulinOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0297-4506
Hannah J Appiah-MadsonOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8408-7729
Daniel L DistelOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3860-194X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryopreservation is the gold standard for preserving high molecular weight (HMW) DNA (>10 kb) in tissue samples. However, frozen tissues are typically thawed either before or during DNA extraction, which can lead to substantial DNA degradation. In this study, we thawed the previously frozen tissues of 10 marine species (five fishes and five invertebrates) in the preservatives EDTA (250 mM, pH 10) or ethanol (EtOH, 95%) and maintained them in their respective preservatives overnight at 4°C before DNA extraction. We then compared the recovery of HMW DNA in these extracts to extracts prepared directly from frozen tissues. To evaluate the effect of these treatments on HMW DNA recovery, we determined the percentage of high molecular weight DNA (%HMW) and yield of HMW DNA normalized by tissue weight (nY) in each DNA extract. The average %HMW values for eight of the 10 species and the average nY values for five of the 10 species were significantly higher in extracts from EDTA-treated tissues compared to extracts from untreated frozen tissues. For all 10 species, we observed no significant decreases in average %HMW or nY values in extracts of EDTA-thawed tissues compared to those extracted directly from frozen tissues. In contrast, EtOH treatment did not significantly improve the average %HMW or nY values in extracts from tissues of nine of the 10 species when compared to extracts prepared directly from frozen tissues. Therefore, investigators may consider EDTA treatment as a simple method for improving HMW DNA recovery from frozen tissues.

Indexed as

CryopreservationDNAEdetic AcidAnimalsEthanolFishesFreezingMolecular WeightDNAEdetic AcidEthanol

Identifiers

PMID40460139
PMCPMC12132941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.