Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40460131›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Multiple cortical systems influence a single vibrissa muscle.

Aman Maharjan, Jason M Guest, Jean-Alban Rathelot, Fiorella M Gomez Osorio, Peter L Strick, Marcel Oberlaender

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Multiple cortical systems influence a single vibrissa muscle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aman Maharjan *In Silico Brain Sciences Group, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior-caesar, Bonn 53175, Germany.
Jason M Guest *In Silico Brain Sciences Group, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior-caesar, Bonn 53175, Germany.
Jean-Alban RathelotInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille 13005, France.
Fiorella M Gomez OsorioIn Silico Brain Sciences Group, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior-caesar, Bonn 53175, Germany.
Peter L StrickNeurobiology Department, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261.
Marcel OberlaenderIn Silico Brain Sciences Group, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior-caesar, Bonn 53175, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9011-0630

Funding

ResourceP40OD010996 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STRICK, PETER · 2012 to 2024
$11.0M
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) 01GQ1002Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) 01IS18052Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) SFB 1089Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) SPP 2041DSF Charitable Foundation (DSFCF) 1805R01EC | European Research Council (ERC) 101069192EC | European Research Council (ERC) 633428HHS | NIH | NIH Office of the Director (OD) P40OD010996NIH HHS P40 OD010996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What is the neural substrate that enables the cerebral cortex to control a single mystacial vibrissa and orchestrate its movement? To answer this question, we injected rabies virus into the intrinsic muscle that protracts the rat C3 vibrissa and used retrograde transneuronal transport to identify the cortical neurons that influence the muscle. A surprisingly diverse set of cortical areas is the origin of disynaptic control over the motoneurons that influence the C3 protractor. More than two thirds of these layer 5 pyramidal neurons (L5PNs) are dispersed in frontal and parietal areas outside the primary motor cortex (vM1). This observation emphasizes the importance of descending motor commands from non-primary motor areas. More than a third of the L5PNs originate from somatosensory areas, such as the barrel field (vS1). The barrel field has been long considered a prototypic model system for studying sensory processing at the level of the cerebral cortex. Even so, we find that the number of L5PNs in vS1, and even their peak density, rivals the number and peak density of L5PNs in vM1. Thus, our results emphasize the importance of the barrel field in processing motor output. The distribution of L5PNs in vM1 and vS1 leads us to propose a model of vibrissa protraction in which vM1 output results in protraction, and vS1 output results in reciprocal inhibition (suppression) of protraction. This paired initiation and suppression of complementary movements may be a general feature of the descending output from the rodent M1 and S1.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexMusclesSomatosensory CortexVibrissaeAnimalsMaleMotor CortexMotor NeuronsPyramidal CellsRabies virusRatsbrainstemcortexforelimbmotor controlwhisker

Identifiers

PMID40460131
PMCPMC12167980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.