ArticlePloS one2025
A cloud-assisted key agreement protocol for the E-healthcare system.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A cloud server centric multifactor lightweight authentication scheme for eHealth systems.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secure data transmission is critical to cloud-based electronic healthcare (e-healthcare) systems. Upon delving into the literature, it becomes clear that several security mechanisms have been developed to ensure the security of exchanged information across patients, physicians, and the cloud server, but they do not resist vulnerabilities such as man-in-the-middle, side-channel, and session key hijacking attacks. These vulnerabilities can seriously compromise the integrity of exchanged medical records. In light of this, the article proposes a cloud-assisted key agreement protocol for the e-healthcare system to enable secure authentication for patient monitoring, enhancing mutual authentication of the participating entities and creating protected session keys for secure open-channel communication. The proposed methodology employs robust and lightweight procedures, including SHA-256 and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), while considering the challenges of implementing strong security protocols in healthcare systems, such as the need for high performance and low energy consumption. The proof of correctness and robustness of the proposed protocol has been analyzed through the Real-Or-Random (RoR) model, ProVerif verification toolkit, and pragmatic illustration, while the efficiency and efficacy were checked by measuring computation, communication, storage costs, and energy consumption. The result obtained from the security analysis demonstrated that the proposed protocol resisting man-in-the-middle, replay, DoS, traceability/tracking, desynchronization, impersonation, and side channel attacks offers key secrecy, confidentiality, integrity, and authorization. In contrast, the result depicted from the performance analysis section shows that the proposed protocol is 46.99% better in communication, 96.46% in computation, and 53.69% in energy consumption, which is inaugurating its superiority over its competitors. Hence, it is recommended for practical implementation in the real-world cloud-based e-healthcare scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.