ArticlePloS one2025
Analysis of IPV success treatment from an AI approach.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging multimodal machine learning for accurate risk identification of intimate partner violence.npj women's health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious social problem in Chile. Understanding the patterns of internalization and the motivations maintaining it is crucial to design optimal treatments that ensure adherence and completeness. This, in addition, is essential to prevent revictimization and improve the quality of life of both victims and their children.The present study analyzes the success of a psychological treatment offered by a Chilean foundation helping IPV victims. A database analysis containing 1,279 cases was performed applying classical statistics and artificial intelligence methods. The aim of the research was to search for cluster grouping and to create a classification model that is able to predict IPV treatment completeness. The main results demonstrate the presence of two main clusters, one including victims who completed the treatment (cluster 1) and a second one containing victims who did not complete the treatment (cluster 2). Cluster classification using an XGBoost model of the treatment completeness had an accuracy of 81%. The results showed that living with the aggressor, age and educational level had the greatest impact on the classification. Considering these factors as input variables allow for a higher precision on the treatment completeness prediction. To our knowledge, this is the first study performed in Chile that uses AI for cluster grouping and for analyzing the variables contributing to the success of an IPV victims' treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.