Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40460081›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Work ability and associated factors among female ready-made garment workers in Bangladesh.

Fathema Tuz Zohra, Md Abdullah Saeed Khan, Shahria Sattar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fathema Tuz ZohraDepartment of Biomedical Science and Engineering, World University of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Abdullah Saeed KhanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-0707-0437
Shahria SattarDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ready-made garment industry plays a crucial role in Bangladesh's economy and has made a significant contribution to womenempowerment by employing millions of female workers. The work ability, reflecting the productivity and well-being of a worker, has been less explored among female garment workers. This study aimed to explore this gap.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted among 395 female garment workers aged ≥18 years at a factory in Dhaka from August-December 2023. Work ability was assessed using the Work Ability Index (WAI). Sociodemographic and work-related factors associated with WAI scores were identified using linear regression analysis.

resultsThe average age (±SD) of the participants was 31.05 ± 6.71 years. The Work Ability Index scores among participants showed a good mean (±SD) score of 40.65 ± 2.71 [Range: 7-49]. Younger age (p < 0.001), not having any children (p = 0.012), lower family income (<12,000 BDT) (p < 0.001), higher duration of job (p = 0.016) and working in the finishing section (p = 0.001) were associated with higher WAI scores. After adjustment, age (β = -0.06, 95% CI -0.10 to -0.01), income (β = -0.63, 95% CI -1.20 to -0.05), and working in finishing (adjusted β = 1.77, 95% CI: 0.32 to 3.21 compared to administration section) were independently associated with WAI scores.

conclusionsThe study identified several factors that can be considered when planning interventions to enhance work ability and well-being of female garment workers.

Indexed as

ClothingTextile IndustryAdolescentAdultBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedWomen, WorkingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40460081
PMCPMC12132991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.