Observational studyPloS one2025
Gut microbiota composition differences are associated with geographic location and age in malaria-endemic regions of Rwanda.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dysosmobacter: from a serendipitous discovery to a next-generation beneficial gut commensal linked to health.eGastroenterology · 2026Review
- Reinventing malaria control: hierarchical intervention strategies for African settings based on the microbiota-barrier-innate immunity axis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence suggests that a significant interplay exists between the host gut microbiota and both the transmission and severity of malaria. Therefore, we explored the association between malaria and the gut microbiota across various geographic regions, considering host's nutritional habits, helminth coinfections and age. This observational study was conducted in 3 malaria-endemic provinces of Rwanda: West, South and East. Demographic data, blood and fecal samples were collected from 169 participants (85 females and 84 males) aged between 2-78 years. We used questionnaire-derived qualitative data based on geographic regions, age, and nutrition. Malaria and soil-transmitted helminth diagnosis was assessed by microscopy. The gut microbial composition was analyzed based on bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. We observed that preschool children had a significantly lower microbiota diversity compared to both school children (q = 0.027, K-Wallis) and adults (q = 0.011, K-Wallis). Unlike age, infection status (uninfected, malaria alone, soil-transmitted helminth alone or coinfection) was not significantly associated with the gut microbiota. However, using Bray-Curtis distances, we found a significantly differential gut microbial beta-diversity with a convergent distribution in the Western province compared to the other provinces (q = 0.0045, pairwise PERMANOVA). This geographic difference was not explained by any change in energy intake, protein, lipids, or carbohydrates consumption but was likely due to lower dietary fibre intake in the West compared to the South (q < 0.0001, ANOVA) and the East (q = 0.07, ANOVA). In conclusion, we have not found significant links between infection and gut microbiota. However, we showed a significant difference in the gut microbiota composition of people living in different geographic locations in Rwanda, possibly due to their nutritional habits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.