ArticleACS synthetic biology2025
Context-Aware Biosensor Design Through Biology-Guided Machine Learning and Dynamical Modeling.
Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the computing power of microbes that shapes the environment.Current opinion in microbiology · 2026Review
- Challenges and Opportunities in Smart Biosensing for Biomanufacturing.ACS synthetic biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Addressing the challenge of achieving a global circular bioeconomy requires efficient and robust bio-based processes operating at different scales. These processes should also be competitive replacements for the production of chemicals currently obtained from fossil resources, as well as for the production of new-to-nature compounds. To that end, genetic circuits can be used to control cellular behavior and are instrumental in developing efficient cell factories. Whole-cell biosensors harbor circuits that can be based on allosteric transcription factors (TFs) to detect and elicit a response depending on the target molecule concentrations. By modifying regulatory elements and testing various genetic components, the responsive behavior of genetic biosensors can be finely tuned and engineered. While previous models have described and characterized the behavior of naringenin biosensors, additional data and resources are required to predict their dynamic response and performance in different contexts, such as under various gene expression regulatory elements, media, carbon sources, or media supplements. Tuning these conditions is pivotal in optimizing biosensor design for applications operating in varying conditions, such as fermentation processes. In this study, we assembled a library of FdeR biosensors, characterized their performance under different conditions, and developed a mechanistic model to describe their dynamic behavior under reference conditions, which guided a machine learning-based predictive model that accounts for context-dependent dynamic parameters. Such a Design-Build-Test-Learn (DBTL) pipeline allowed us to determine optimal condition combinations for the desired biosensor specifications, both for automated screening and dynamic regulation. The findings of this work contribute to a deeper understanding of whole-cell biosensors and their potential for precise measurement, screening, and dynamic regulation of engineered production pathways for valuable molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.