ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Establishment and Application of a Grading Management Model for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the preferred surgical method for treating various benign gallbladder diseases. Despite extensive research domestically and internationally on the identification of risk factors associated with LC, there remains a significant deficiency in the development of efficient and practical grading management models for LC surgery, particularly concerning the surgical experience of surgeons. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study was conducted across 2 hospitals in Shanghai from June 2013 to June 2018. Retrospective analysis using chi-square tests was performed to identify factors influencing the conversion to open surgery and the incidence of complications following LC. Thereafter, logistic regression analysis was performed using the likelihood ratio test based on the maximum partial likelihood estimates, to ascertain these risk factors. Simultaneously, using the scoring system, a hierarchical management model for LC procedures was developed and subsequently validated through a prospective cohort study. RESULTS The receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed, yielding an area under the curve of 0.893 (95% confidence interval: 0.871 to 0.914). An evaluation score exceeding 3 indicated a higher risk associated with LC surgery. Clinical validation demonstrated that this scoring system, in conjunction with a stratified management approach, can effectively reduce the open conversion rate and minimize surgical complications for LC procedures. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to combine the experience of surgeons for LC surgery grading management, and demonstrates the reliability and effectiveness of the scoring system and hierarchical management method, reducing the conversion rate and surgical complications of LC surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.