Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40460023›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025

Generating synthetic electronic health record data: a methodological scoping review with benchmarking on phenotype data and open-source software.

Xingran Chen, Zhenke Wu, Xu Shi, Hyunghoon Cho, Bhramar Mukherjee

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xingran ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5705-1680
Zhenke WuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7582-669X
Xu ShiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8566-9552
Hyunghoon ChoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Bhramar MukherjeeDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.

Funding

MI-CARES: The Michigan Cancer and Research on the Environment StudyUG3CA267907 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DOLINOY, DANA, MUKHERJEE, BHRAMAR · 2021 to 2022
$2.2M
MI-CARES 1UG3CA267907National Science FoundationNational Science Foundation and MI-CARES 1UG3CA267907National Science Foundation and MI-CARES DMS1712933NCI NIH HHS UG3 CA267907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo conduct a scoping review (ScR) of existing approaches for synthetic Electronic Health Records (EHR) data generation, to benchmark major methods, and to provide an open-source software and offer recommendations for practitioners. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe search three academic databases for our scoping review. Methods are benchmarked on open-source EHR datasets, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III and IV (MIMIC-III/IV). Seven existing methods covering major categories and two baseline methods are implemented and compared. Evaluation metrics concern data fidelity, downstream utility, privacy protection, and computational cost.

resultsForty-eight studies are identified and classified into five categories. Seven open-source methods covering all categories are selected, trained on MIMIC-III, and evaluated on MIMIC-III or MIMIC-IV for transportability considerations. Among them, Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based methods demonstrate competitive performance in fidelity and utility on MIMIC-III, rule-based methods excel in privacy protection. Similar findings are observed on MIMIC-IV, except that GAN-based methods further outperform the baseline methods in preserving fidelity. DISCUSSION: Method choice is governed by the relative importance of the evaluation metrics in downstream use cases. We provide a decision tree to guide the choice among the benchmarked methods. An extensible Python package, "SynthEHRella", is provided to facilitate streamlined evaluations.

conclusionGAN-based methods excel when distributional shifts exist between the training and testing populations. Otherwise, CorGAN and MedGAN are most suitable for association modeling and predictive modeling, respectively. Future research should prioritize enhancing fidelity of the synthetic data while controlling privacy exposure, and comprehensive benchmarking of longitudinal or conditional generation methods.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsSoftwareBenchmarkingHumansPhenotypebenchmarkingconfidentialitygenerative AIscoping reviewsynthetic EHR

Identifiers

PMID40460023
PMCPMC12203555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.