ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025
Generating synthetic electronic health record data: a methodological scoping review with benchmarking on phenotype data and open-source software.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Patient Simulation Framework for Risk Assessment of Conversational Health Care AI: Development and Evaluation Study.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- Review
- Generating synthetic multi-national longitudinal cohorts for clinically grounded HIV research.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Rare Diseases: Workflow-Integrated Precision Kidney Care.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
- Hierarchical heated markov modeling for synthesizing activity data from wearable devices.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Generating Synthetic Multi-national Longitudinal Cohorts for Clinically Grounded HIV Research.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Framework for bias evaluation in large language models in healthcare settings.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo conduct a scoping review (ScR) of existing approaches for synthetic Electronic Health Records (EHR) data generation, to benchmark major methods, and to provide an open-source software and offer recommendations for practitioners. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe search three academic databases for our scoping review. Methods are benchmarked on open-source EHR datasets, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III and IV (MIMIC-III/IV). Seven existing methods covering major categories and two baseline methods are implemented and compared. Evaluation metrics concern data fidelity, downstream utility, privacy protection, and computational cost.
resultsForty-eight studies are identified and classified into five categories. Seven open-source methods covering all categories are selected, trained on MIMIC-III, and evaluated on MIMIC-III or MIMIC-IV for transportability considerations. Among them, Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based methods demonstrate competitive performance in fidelity and utility on MIMIC-III, rule-based methods excel in privacy protection. Similar findings are observed on MIMIC-IV, except that GAN-based methods further outperform the baseline methods in preserving fidelity. DISCUSSION: Method choice is governed by the relative importance of the evaluation metrics in downstream use cases. We provide a decision tree to guide the choice among the benchmarked methods. An extensible Python package, "SynthEHRella", is provided to facilitate streamlined evaluations.
conclusionGAN-based methods excel when distributional shifts exist between the training and testing populations. Otherwise, CorGAN and MedGAN are most suitable for association modeling and predictive modeling, respectively. Future research should prioritize enhancing fidelity of the synthetic data while controlling privacy exposure, and comprehensive benchmarking of longitudinal or conditional generation methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.