ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2025
Mass-rearing and life history of Cyclocephala barrerai (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae) and congeneric species.
Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Cuticular Hydrocarbons in the Intraspecific Sexual Recognition Of Cyclocephala barrerai (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae).Journal of chemical ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A major challenge in studying the biology of the Melolonthidae has been the lack of a consistent supply of organisms with known characteristics. This study aimed to develop a methodology for mass-rearing a Cyclocephala barrerai Martínez (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae) colony over several laboratory generations. The mass-rearing was initiated with eggs from wild-collected adults; each developmental instar was reared under conditions suited to their environmental and nutritional needs. Insect survival, egg-adult cycle length, sex ratio, adult weight, and number of eggs laid by each female were recorded for each generation. The morphology of mass-rearing organisms was compared to that of the wild-collected specimens. A second cohort of organisms from the original generation was reared under identical conditions and their survival, duration, and morphometry of each larval instar were recorded weekly. These data were then compared to those from the original group to assess the impact of constant manipulation during the larval instar. The mass-rearing methodology proposed in this work successfully reared 3 generations of C. barrerai with an overall average egg-adult survival rate of 66.6%. The egg-adult cycle length, proportion of females and males, and average weight differed among generations. The F1 organisms presented similar morphometrics to those collected in the field. Manipulation significantly reduced insect survival. Mass-rearing of C. barrerai facilitates a comprehensive study of its biology and may establish the species as a model for the Melolonthidae. This methodology establishes the foundations for rearing congeneric species in the laboratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.