ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2025
A non-destructive, fast, inexpensive, non-toxic chelating resin-based DNA extraction protocol for insect voucher specimens and associated microbiomes.
Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocols and challenges in managing multi-source biological evidence at the crime scene: a scoping review.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- Article
- Exploring the Quality of Historic DNA From Pinned Beetles.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Advancement of methods in insect science: from genes to ecosystems.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2026Article
- A Workflow for Phytoplasma Discovery and Characterization in Potential Insect Vectors: From Non-destructive DNA Extraction and Vouchering to Next-Generation Sequencing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying a DNA extraction method that yields high quantity and quality DNA is a crucial component of molecular ecological studies; and the best suited method can vary greatly depending on research priorities. Here, we propose a nondestructive extraction method for insect museum vouchers aimed at analyzing gut-associated microbiomes. The leafhopper Euscelidius variegatus (Kirschbaum) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) associated with the bacterial plant pathogen Flavescence dorée phytoplasma, a member of the genus 'Candidatus Phytoplasma' (Mollicutes: Acholeplasmataceae), was used as an experimental model. We developed and refined a resin-based DNA extraction protocol by testing the effects of prelysis bleaching and postlysis proteinase K inactivation on DNA quality and yield. We found that bleaching did not compromise the integrity of insect and associated bacterial DNA and that excluding the inactivation of proteinase K did not interfere with quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. Based on our findings, we recommend a DNA extraction protocol for insect voucher specimens and associated microbiomes that includes a prelysis bleaching step to chemically degrade external contaminants without proteinase K inactivation, thereby reducing processing time. Our refined protocol resulted in a high DNA yield, which we successfully analyzed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis and other downstream molecular applications, including targeted high-throughput sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.