ArticleHealth services research2025
Employment, Income, the ACA, and Health Insurance Coverage of Working-Age Adults During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Reassessment.
Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Employment, Income, the ACA, and Health Insurance Coverage of Working-Age Adults During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Reassessment.Health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the effects of income, income transitions, and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion on health insurance coverage for working-age adults who became unemployed during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and for those who remained employed. STUDY SETTING AND
designWe estimated panel-data regression models to assess the effects of employment, income and income transitions, and the Medicaid expansion on the type of insurance coverage and uninsurance among working-age adults in the United States during 2019 and 2020. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Longitudinal data from the 2019-2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and data on states' Medicaid expansion status. The study participants were 6435 adults aged 26-64. PRINCIPAL
findingsParticipants in all income groups who suffered spells of unemployment during the pandemic lost employer-sponsored insurance. In expansion states, the Medicaid expansion played a key role in preventing declines in insurance coverage for disadvantaged participants. The expansion was especially beneficial for participants with low pre-pandemic incomes who had unemployment spells during the pandemic (7.5% point increase in Medicaid coverage [95% CI, 1.2 to 13.8]) and for participants who transitioned from high pre-pandemic incomes to low pandemic incomes whether or not they lost their jobs (23.9% point increase in Medicaid coverage [95% CI, 7.8 to 40.0] during unemployment spells; 12.0% point increase [95% CI, 7.2 to 16.9] for those who remained employed). We found weaker evidence that private exchange coverage blunted increases in uninsurance in non-expansion states.
conclusionOur findings clarify findings from earlier research by demonstrating that not only employment status and pre-pandemic income, but also income transitions, played a key role in determining who received Medicaid coverage during the pandemic in Medicaid expansion states. All in all, the ACA acquitted itself relatively well during a very stressful period for the United States' system of health insurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.