ArticleOrbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Deep learning model for differentiating thyroid eye disease and orbital myositis on computed tomography (CT) imaging.
Article in Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in oculoplastics: Novel applications and future prospects.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a deep learning model using orbital computed tomography (CT) imaging to accurately distinguish thyroid eye disease (TED) and orbital myositis, two conditions with overlapping clinical presentations.
methodsRetrospective, single-center cohort study spanning 12 years including normal controls, TED, and orbital myositis patients with orbital imaging and examination by an oculoplastic surgeon. A deep learning model employing a Visual Geometry Group-16 network was trained on various binary combinations of TED, orbital myositis, and controls using single slices of coronal orbital CT images.
resultsA total of 1628 images from 192 patients (110 TED, 51 orbital myositis, 31 controls) were included. The primary model comparing orbital myositis and TED had accuracy of 98.4% and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.999. In detecting orbital myositis, it had a sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score of 0.964, 0.994, and 0.984, respectively.
conclusionsDeep learning models can differentiate TED and orbital myositis based on a single, coronal orbital CT image with high accuracy. Their ability to distinguish these conditions based not only on extraocular muscle enlargement but also other salient features suggests potential applications in diagnostics and treatment beyond these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.