ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2025
The Role of Mobility in Intertidal Invertebrates' Responses to Thermal Stress.
Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As climate change progresses, it is important to be able to predict how the effects of elevated temperatures are affected by the ability of ectotherms to seek shelter. Many studies on ectotherms have suggested that mobility is a vital characteristic to understand how species will react to warming. Highly mobile ectotherms are not often exposed to thermally stressful conditions because they can actively select temperatures that are thermally beneficial or benign. Slow-moving or sessile ectotherms, however, are not able to change habitats quickly enough to escape from thermal stress or even death. In order to measure how mobility affected how organisms cope with temperature, we quantified the body temperatures, environmental temperatures (using biomimetic models), and thermal limits using respirometry of eight intertidal ectotherms in four mobility classes: fast, intermediate, slow, and sessile. In addition, we also calculated thermal safety margins (TSMs) for each of our species. While we predicted that fast and intermediately mobile species would have lower thermal limits and narrower TSMs than slow and sessile animals, we found that faster organisms had lower thermal limits and narrower thermal safety margins than the other three mobility classes. Our findings indicate that there is an effect of mobility on how organisms cope with temperatures and lay the groundwork for understanding how communities may respond to climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.