ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2025
Effects of chronic volume deprivation on the ventricle.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLittle is known of the haemodynamic changes following chronic ventricular volume deprivation, which impact understanding the disease course and treatment results. An animal model was created to study the effects of chronic ventricular volume deprivation and acute reloading.
methodsIn 13 lambs, a polytetrafluoroethylene strip was placed around the inferior and superior caval vein through thoracotomy resulting in progressive ventricular volume deprivation during growth. After 10 months, the polytetrafluoroethylene bands were relieved. Magnetic resonance imaging and haemodynamic measurements including pressure-volume loops were performed before and after debanding and compared to age and weight-matched controls (n = 6).
resultsThe end-diastolic pressure was elevated compared to healthy animals (median [interquartile range] 8.1 [7.2-9.1] vs 1.0 [1.0-2.7] mmHg, P 0.030). The end-diastolic pressure after debanding increased to 11.1 (10.4-17.2) mmHg, P 0.038. The end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume of the intervention group were also significantly less than the healthy controls (71.5 [66.7-74.7] vs 81.5 [74.3-86.3] ml, P 0.004 and 34.5 [27.5-37.6] vs 42.7 [35.0-50.5] ml P 0.001). The end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship was significantly shifted upwards and to the left compared to controls, indicative of a decreased compliance of the chronically deprived left ventricle. Histologic assessment revealed no significant differences in fibrosis between the ventricles of the intervention group and healthy animals.
conclusionsWhen a healthy ventricle is chronically deprived of an adequate preload, it becomes less compliant with elevated filling pressures. Acute reloading does not lead to ventricular systolic dysfunction, but in the early phase, diastolic pressure may rise. A better understanding of this phenomenon might help to recognition and treatment of impaired ventricular compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.