Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459831›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025

A white matter-centered approach to investigate recurrence pathways in high-grade gliomas: a single-center retrospective study.

Salvatore Marino, Grazia Menna, Francesco Doglietto, Davide Quaranta, Silvia Chiesa, Simona Gaudino, Rosellina Russo, Gianmaria Marziali, Marco Galeazzi, Quintino Giorgio D'Alessandris and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Salvatore Marino *Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Grazia Menna *Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy. mennagrazia@gmail.com.
Francesco DogliettoNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Davide QuarantaNeurology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Silvia ChiesaDepartment of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Simona GaudinoDiagnostic Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Rosellina RussoDiagnostic Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Gianmaria MarzialiDiagnostic Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Marco GaleazziNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Quintino Giorgio D'AlessandrisNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Liverana LaurettiNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Pier Paolo MattognoNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Rina Di BonaventuraNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Naike CaragliaNeurology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Lucia Di MaioDepartment of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro OliviNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe Maria Della PepaNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimHigh-grade gliomas (HGGs) are aggressive primary brain tumors with inevitable recurrence. This single-center retrospective study investigates whether the anatomical proximity of HGGs to major white matter tracts influences progression and recurrence. The study explores the association between tumor location and recurrence type-local, remote, or ependymal-and whether recurrences align with adjacent white matter tracts.

methodsThe study included patients with histopathologically confirmed recurrent HGGs who underwent reoperation. Primary tumors were categorized into four anatomical subgroups using a connectivity-based framework from the HCP 1065 Atlas: Subgroup A: Long Fronto-Temporo-Parietal Network Subgroup B: Temporal Pole Network (further divided into B1, B2, and B3 based on connectivity patterns) Subgroup C: Frontal Pole Network Subgroup D: Commissural and Projection Networks (further divided into D1 and D2). Recurrences were classified via post-contrast T1-weighted MRI as local, remote, ependymal. The Tract-to-Region Connectome (T-R-C) assessed the volumetric overlap between recurrence maps and main white matter bundles.

resultsOf 41 patients, a significant correlation emerged between tumor subgroup and recurrence type (p = 0.0003). Subgroup A predominantly showed remote recurrences (68%), while B2, B3, C, and D2 had mainly local recurrences. Subgroup D1 had a predominance of ependymal recurrences (66.7%). Local and remote recurrences largely conformed to adjacent white matter distributions, with variations in timing of recurrence and survival observed across different groups.

conclusionOur analysis, focused on exploring the spatial aspects of recurrence in relation to white matter anatomy, suggests that HGG recurrence patterns are strongly influenced by anatomical location and white matter architecture. Certain anatomical areas show a predisposition toward specific recurrence patterns. Recognizing these spatial dynamics may guide more precise surgical strategies, radiotherapy targeting, and recurrence risk assessment.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalWhite MatterAdultAgedConnectomeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultHigh grade gliomaRecurrenceWhite matter

Identifiers

PMID40459831
PMCPMC12198263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.