Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459794›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2025

Predicting genetic merit in Harnali sheep using machine learning techniques.

Spandan Shashwat Dash, Yogesh C Bangar, Ankit Magotra, C S Patil

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Spandan Shashwat DashDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Yogesh C BangarDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India. yogeshbangar07@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8861-161X
Ankit MagotraDirectorate of Research, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, (SKUAST Jammu), Jammu, Kashmir, 180009, India.
C S PatilDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary Sciences, Rani Lakshmibai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, 284003, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning techniques offer promising avenues for enhancing animal breeding programs by leveraging genomic and phenotypic data to predict valuable traits accurately. In this study, we evaluated seven machine learning algorithms viz., K-nearest Network (KNN), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Bayesian Regression (BR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) for predicting genetic merits of Harnali sheep using pedigree and phenotypic information. The dataset comprised records of 2036 Harnali lambs spanning from 1998 to 2021, with predictors including pedigree records, birth year, sex, weight at lambing, birth weight, weaning weight, average daily gain, and six-month body weight. Breeding values for six-month body weight were estimated using the restricted maximum likelihood method under Wombat software. Machine learning algorithms were trained and tested on a 75% train set and 25% test set, respectively. The algorithms were compared based on goodness of fit criteria including coefficient of determination (R

Indexed as

BreedingMachine LearningSheep, DomesticAlgorithmsAnimalsBayes TheoremFemaleMalePedigreePhenotypeBreeding valuesHarnali sheepMachine learningPrediction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.