Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459786›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2025

Assessing Brain Network Dynamics During Postural Control Task Using EEG Microstates.

Carmine Gelormini, Lorena Guerrini, Federica Pescaglia, Romain Aubonnet, Halldór Jónsson, Hannes Petersen, Giorgio Di Lorenzo, Paolo Gargiulo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carmine GelorminiInstitute of Biomedical and Neural Engineering, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland. carmine23@ru.is.ORCID 0009-0006-3571-5593
Lorena GuerriniInstitute of Biomedical and Neural Engineering, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-6308-8981
Federica PescagliaInstitute of Biomedical and Neural Engineering, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0009-0008-6006-6219
Romain AubonnetLaboratory of Psychophysiology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of System Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vegata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5395-775X
Halldór JónssonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0001-8406-9328
Hannes PetersenFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-2327-523X
Giorgio Di LorenzoLaboratory of Psychophysiology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of System Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vegata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0576-4064
Paolo GargiuloInstitute of Biomedical and Neural Engineering, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-5049-4817

Funding

Rannís 239612-051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to maintain our body's balance and stability in space is crucial for performing daily activities. Effective postural control (PC) strategies rely on integrating visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive sensory inputs. While neuroimaging has revealed key areas involved in PC-including brainstem, cerebellum, and cortical networks-the rapid neural mechanisms underlying dynamic postural tasks remain less understood. Therefore, we used EEG microstate analysis within the BioVRSea experiment to explore the temporal brain dynamics that support PC. This complex paradigm simulates maintaining an upright posture on a moving platform, integrated with virtual reality (VR), to replicate the sensation of balancing on a boat. Data were acquired from 266 healthy subjects using a 64-channel EEG system. Using a modified k-means method, five EEG microstate maps were identified to best model the paradigm. Differences in each microstate maps feature (occurrence, duration, and coverage) between experimental phases were analyzed using a linear mixed model, revealing significant differences between microstates within the experiment phases. The temporal parameters of microstate C showed significantly higher levels in all experimental phases compared to other microstate maps, whereas microstate B displayed an opposite pattern, consistently showing lower levels. This study marks the first attempt to use microstate analysis during a dynamic task, demonstrating the decisive role of microstate C and, conversely, microstate B in differentiating the PC phases. These results demonstrate the utility of microstate technique in studying temporal brain dynamics during PC, with potential applications in the early detection of neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyNerve NetPostural BalancePostureAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultElectroencephalography (EEG)MicrostatesNeural NetworksPostural ControlTemporal Brain DynamicsVirtual Reality

Identifiers

PMID40459786
PMCPMC12133945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.