Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459775›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2025

N-acetylcysteine: a potential therapeutic agent against toxicity of pesticides.

Jagjeet Singh, Annu Phogat, Vinay Malik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jagjeet SinghDepartment of Zoology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India.
Annu PhogatDepartment of Zoology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India.
Vinay MalikDepartment of Zoology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India. vinaymalikzoo@mdurohtak.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8909-9542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a well-known health supplement that acts as a precursor to glutathione and exhibits antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and modulatory activities. Several studies have extensively investigated the biological efficacy of NAC, including its effects on oxidative stress, cellular antioxidants, signal transduction, and structural anomalies caused by xenobiotics, including pesticides. This review summarizes the evidence of the ameliorative potential of NAC against oxidative stress and details its therapeutic potential in alleviating the toxicity of pesticides. Both in vivo and in vitro experiments have shown that NAC exerts its biological efficacy via regulation of TGF-β1/Smad3, MAPK, NF-κB, and PGC-1α/Tfam signaling pathways and rejuvenation of endogenous antioxidants.The present review provides insights into the recent findings and the mechanistic basis of the therapeutic potential of NAC for implementing it as an ameliorative agent against pesticide toxicity.

Indexed as

AcetylcysteinePesticidesAnimalsAntioxidantsHumansOxidative StressSignal TransductionAcetylcysteineAntioxidantsPesticidesAntioxidantsN-acetylcysteineOxidative stressPesticideToxicity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.