ArticleDysphagia2025
Use of Transfer Learning for the Automated Segmentation and Detection of Swallows via Digital Cervical Auscultation in Children.
Article in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multimodal In-Ear Audio and Physiological Dataset for Swallowing and Non-Verbal Event Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Respiratory-swallow assessment protocol for adult dysphagia management.BMC research notes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital cervical auscultation (CA) has high diagnostic test accuracy in the detection of aspiration in children. However, the clinical application of digital CA is limited because swallow sound recordings require manual segmentation by trained experts, which is time consuming and not feasible in clinical practice. The automated detection of swallowing sounds in adults from sound recordings have reported accuracies between 76 and 95%. No equivalent literature exists for the automated detection of swallowing sounds in children. This study aimed to establish whether automated machine learning using a transfer learning approach can accurately detect and segment swallows from digital CA recordings in children. Swallow sounds were collected from 16 typically developing children, median age 18 months (range 4-35 months, 50% males); and 19 videofluoroscopic swallow studies of children with pediatric feeding disorders, median age 9 months (range 3-71 months, males 36.8% males). All swallowing sounds were on thin fluids. A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) that was pre-trained for the task of audio event classification was used as the base machine learning model. Using the raw swallow audio data as input, embedding vectors from the base DCNN were computed and used to train a feedforward neural network to identify whether an audio segment was a swallow or not. A high overall accuracy of 91% was achieved using our model, with a sensitivity (or recall) and positive predictability (or precision) of 81% and 79%, respectively. Interestingly, the model was also able to detect saliva swallows in the clinical feeding evaluation test set, even though these non-nutritive swallows were not part of the training set. This indicates a level of generalizability of the model, where it was able to recognize swallowing events that it had not "seen" before. Our study provides the highest accuracy reported to date on the automatic segmentation and detection of swallowing sounds in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.