Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459758›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2025

Use of Transfer Learning for the Automated Segmentation and Detection of Swallows via Digital Cervical Auscultation in Children.

Stephen So, Timothy Tadj, Belinda Schwerin, Anne B Chang, Thuy T Frakking

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephen SoSchool of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.
Timothy TadjSchool of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.
Belinda SchwerinSchool of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.
Anne B ChangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Queensland Children's Hospital, 501 Stanley St, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.
Thuy T FrakkingResearch Development Unit, Caboolture Hospital, Metro North Hospital & Health Service, McKean St, Caboolture, QLD, 4510, Australia. thuy.frakking@health.qld.gov.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2724-6919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital cervical auscultation (CA) has high diagnostic test accuracy in the detection of aspiration in children. However, the clinical application of digital CA is limited because swallow sound recordings require manual segmentation by trained experts, which is time consuming and not feasible in clinical practice. The automated detection of swallowing sounds in adults from sound recordings have reported accuracies between 76 and 95%. No equivalent literature exists for the automated detection of swallowing sounds in children. This study aimed to establish whether automated machine learning using a transfer learning approach can accurately detect and segment swallows from digital CA recordings in children. Swallow sounds were collected from 16 typically developing children, median age 18 months (range 4-35 months, 50% males); and 19 videofluoroscopic swallow studies of children with pediatric feeding disorders, median age 9 months (range 3-71 months, males 36.8% males). All swallowing sounds were on thin fluids. A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) that was pre-trained for the task of audio event classification was used as the base machine learning model. Using the raw swallow audio data as input, embedding vectors from the base DCNN were computed and used to train a feedforward neural network to identify whether an audio segment was a swallow or not. A high overall accuracy of 91% was achieved using our model, with a sensitivity (or recall) and positive predictability (or precision) of 81% and 79%, respectively. Interestingly, the model was also able to detect saliva swallows in the clinical feeding evaluation test set, even though these non-nutritive swallows were not part of the training set. This indicates a level of generalizability of the model, where it was able to recognize swallowing events that it had not "seen" before. Our study provides the highest accuracy reported to date on the automatic segmentation and detection of swallowing sounds in children.

Indexed as

AuscultationDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersMachine LearningChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleNeural Networks, ComputerCervical auscultationDeglutitionMachine learningPediatricSignal processingSwallowing sounds

Identifiers

PMID40459758
PMCPMC12662899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.