ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Factors influencing computed tomography determined stone-free rates after ureteroscopy in real-world and its impact on retreatment rates at medium-term follow-up.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal duration of pre-stenting before RIRS: a prospective randomized study evaluating FANS-UAS placement success.World journal of urology · 2026Trial
- Article
- Zero residual fragment ureteroscopy: from possibility to reality - an EAU endourology perspective.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesResidual stone fragments (RFs) following ureteroscopy increase the risk of reintervention. This study assesses stone-free rates (SFR) using non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT), identifies factors influencing SFR, and investigates the relationship between RFs and retreatment rates (RTR).
methodsPatients who underwent ureteroscopy for urolithiasis between September 2017 and March 2024 were included if they had postoperative NCCT. Exclusion criteria include nephrocalcinosis and combined intrarenal surgery. Clinical data, procedural details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models assessed factors affecting SFR and RTR. A Kaplan Meier curve analyzed time to retreatment after surgery. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATION: Among 457 patients (519 renal units) the true SFR was 42.8%, increasing to 58.4% and 78.6% when RFs < 3 mm and < 4 mm were included. Factors negatively associated with SFR included prior urolithiasis treatment, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, positive urine culture, prior stenting, larger stone size, and mid- or lower-pole stone location. Conversely, exclusively ureteric stones and single stones were associated with higher SFR. On multivariate analysis, positive urine culture, prior urolithiasis treatment, increasing stone size, and mid-pole stone location remained significant predictors of reduced SFR. Logistic regression revealed the odds ratio for RTR with RF > 3 mm versus RF < 3 mm was 7.14 (95% CI: 1.96-24.39). Limitations included the risk of missing some stone-related outcomes during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The NCCT determined true SFR was 42.8%, with the size of RFs strongly correlating with the RTR. Patients with residual calculi should be counselled about increased risk of retreatment rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.