ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Prediction of etiology and prognosis based on hematoma location of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a multicenter diagnostic study.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Poor Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning in neuroradiology: Recent developments and applications.World journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Non-Contrast Brain Computed Tomography Scan for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Scoping Review.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe location of the hemorrhagic of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) is clinically pivotal for both identifying its etiology and prognosis, but comprehensive and quantitative modeling approach has yet to be thoroughly explored.
methodsWe employed lesion-symptom mapping to extract the location features of sICH. We registered patients' non-contrast computed tomography image and hematoma masks with standard human brain templates to identify specific affected brain regions. Then, we generated hemorrhage probabilistic maps of different etiologies and prognoses. By integrating radiomics and clinical features into multiple logistic regression models, we developed and validated optimal etiological and prognostic models across three centers, comprising 1162 sICH patients.
resultsHematomas of different etiology have unique spatial distributions. The location-based features demonstrated robust classification of the etiology of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), with a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.825 across diverse datasets. These features provided significant incremental value when integrated into predictive models (fusion model mean AUC = 0.915), outperforming models relying solely on clinical features (mean AUC = 0.828). In prognostic assessments, both hematoma location (mean AUC = 0.762) and radiomic features (mean AUC = 0.837) contributed substantial incremental predictive value, as evidenced by the fusion model's mean AUC of 0.873, compared to models utilizing clinical features alone (mean AUC = 0.771).
conclusionsOur results show that location features were more intrinsically robust, generalizable relative, strong interpretability to the complex modeling of radiomics, our approach demonstrated a novel interpretable, streamlined, comprehensive etiologic classification and prognostic prediction framework for sICH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.