ArticleDermatology and therapy2025
Real‑World Experience of 1 Year of Tralokinumab Treatment in Adult Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biologic Therapies Targeting Type 2 Signaling in Atopic Dermatitis: A Comparative Review of Structural and Thermodynamic Differences in Mechanism of Action.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2025Review
- Transitioning from Cyclosporine to Tralokinumab in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Prospective Real-World Comparison of Direct Switch vs. Short Overlap.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Real-World Clinical Practice Evaluation of Tralokinumab in Atopic Dermatitis: A 52-Week Multi-Center Retrospective Study in the Basque Country.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAtopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease requiring long-term management. Biologic therapies have emerged as systemic treatment options for AD, and real-world evidence (RWE) of their use is needed to inform optimal treatment decisions.
methodsA retrospective, single-center case series was conducted including 37 adults with AD who were systemic-naive or inadequately responded to previous AD treatment and had a visit around 1 year after tralokinumab initiation prior to May 2024. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment history were collected. Outcomes of tralokinumab treatment, including investigator's global assessment (IGA) score, body surface area (BSA), and adverse events (AEs), were extracted from a 2-month visit (defined as 1-3 months) and a 1-year visit (defined as ≥ 10 months) after tralokinumab initiation.
resultsThirty-seven patients (median age, 58.0 years; 49% male) on tralokinumab for approximately 1 year or longer were included. At baseline, most patients (97% [33/34]) had moderate-to-severe AD (IGA 3 or 4), and median (interquartile range [IQR]) BSA was 10.0% (5.0%; 18.8%); 19% (7/37) of patients were biologic-experienced, having been previously on dupilumab. Most patients (95% [35/37]) transitioned to tralokinumab due to inadequate response to previous treatment. The proportion of patients with IGA score 0 or 1 increased from 0% (0/34) at baseline to 85% (22/26) after 2 months and 93% (28/30) at 1 year of tralokinumab treatment. Median (IQR) BSA improved to 0.5% (0.0%; 1.0%) and 0.0% (0.0%; 1.0%) at the 2-month and 1-year visits, respectively. Similar improvements were observed regardless of Fitzpatrick skin type or previous treatment history. No AEs were reported through 1 year of follow-up.
conclusionsThis large case series provides RWE building on tralokinumab clinical trial data and highlights the potential rapid and long-term response in patients with AD irrespective of their Fitzpatrick skin type or treatment history, including patients previously treated with dupilumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.