ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025
Developing a CT radiomics-based model for assessing split renal function using machine learning.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Deep Learning for Renal Mass Characterization in Challenging Cases: A Comparative Study of Spatial-Input Strategies and a Validated ROI-Only DLR Nomogram.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Percutaneous thermal ablation for renal cell carcinoma: a comprehensive review of current evidence and future directions.La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- Integrating kidney imaging for risk prediction, therapeutic monitoring, and prognostication across the kidney disease spectrum: a review of emerging evidence.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Noninvasive prediction of T-score in IgA nephropathy using machine learning within the Oxford classification system.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to investigate whether non-contrast computed tomography radiomics can effectively reflect split renal function and to develop a radiomics model for its assessment. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included kidneys from the study center and split them into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Renal dynamic imaging was used as the reference standard for measuring split renal function. Based on chronic kidney disease staging, kidneys were categorized into three groups according to glomerular filtration rate: > 45 ml/min/1.73 m
resultsA total of 543 kidneys were included, with 381 in the training set and 162 in the testing set. In the training set, 16 features identified as most important for distinguishing between the groups were ultimately included to develop the random forest model. The model demonstrated good discriminatory ability in the testing set. The AUC for the > 45 ml/min/1.73 m
conclusionNon-contrast computed tomography radiomics can effectively reflect split renal function information, and the model developed based on it can accurately assess split renal function, holding great potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.