Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459685›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2025

Estimation of Task-Related Dynamic Brain Connectivity via Data Inflation and Classification Model Explainability.

Peter Rogelj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter RogeljFaculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Glagoljaška 8, Koper, SI-6000, Slovenia. peter.rogelj@upr.si.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study of brain function often involves analyzing task-related switching between intrinsic brain networks, which connect various brain regions. Functional brain connectivity analysis methods aim to estimate these networks but are limited by the statistical constraints of windowing functions, which reduce temporal resolution and hinder explainability of highly dynamic processes. In this work, we propose a novel approach to functional connectivity analysis through the explainability of EEG classification. Unlike conventional methods that condense raw data into extracted features, our approach inflates raw EEG data by decomposition into meaningful components that explain processes in the application domain. To uncover the brain connectivity that affects classification decisions, we introduce a new method of dynamic influence data inflation (DIDI), which extracts signals representing interactions between electrode regions. These inflated data are then classified using an end-to-end neural network classifier architecture designed for raw EEG signals. Saliency map estimation from trained classifiers reveals the connectivity dynamics affecting classification decisions, which can be visualized as dynamic connectivity support maps for improved interpretability. The methodology is demonstrated on two publicly available datasets: one for imagined motor movement classification and the other for emotion classification. The results highlight the dual benefits of our approach: in addition to providing interpretable insights into connectivity dynamics it increases classification accuracy.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyModels, NeurologicalNerve NetAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerNeural PathwaysClassificationData inflationEEGExplainabilityFunctional connectivitySaliency maps

Identifiers

PMID40459685
PMCPMC12133929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.