ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025
Interventional Management of Intracoronary Dissection/Hematoma: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conservative management without routine bailout stent for non-flow-limiting dissection after DCB angioplasty: a prospective three-arm study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewIntracoronary dissection and hematoma are rare but significant causes of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), often leading to myocardial ischemia and infarction. Given their heterogeneous clinical presentation and the limited evidence on optimal management strategies, this review aims to evaluate current treatment approaches, including conservative, percutaneous, and surgical options, while highlighting emerging innovations and future research directions. RECENT
findingsRecent studies emphasize the role of advanced intracoronary imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), in improving diagnostic accuracy and guiding therapeutic decisions. Conservative management is increasingly recognized as a viable option for stable patients, offering favorable long-term outcomes. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is indicated in cases with ongoing ischemia, hemodynamic instability, or high-risk anatomical features, though it carries risks such as dissection propagation and coronary rupture. Surgical intervention remains essential in cases of failed PCI or left main stem involvement, demonstrating high survival rates despite procedural challenges. Tailored therapeutic strategies, informed by patient-specific factors and intracoronary imaging, are crucial for optimizing outcomes in intracoronary dissection and hematoma. While conservative management is effective in selected cases, PCI and surgical interventions remain vital for high-risk patients. Future research should focus on refining risk stratification tools, improving imaging modalities, and developing standardized treatment algorithms to enhance patient care and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40459672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.