Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459671›Full record

ArticleAmbio2025

What are forests for? Social perceptions of the functions of public-managed forests following mega-fire events.

Elisabete Figueiredo, Eduarda Fernandes, Cristina Ribeiro, Carla Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elisabete FigueiredoDepartment of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences and GOVCOPP - Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal. elisa@ua.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-3369
Eduarda FernandesSchool of Technology and Management and CARME - Centre of Applied Research in Management and Economics, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Morro do Lena - Alto do Vieiro, Apartado 4163, 2411-901, Leiria, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6584-0412
Cristina RibeiroCoLab Forestwise, Quinta de Prados, Campus da UTAD, 5001-801, Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5482-3510
Carla FerreiraCETRAD - Centre for Transdisciplinary Development Studies, University of Alto Douro and Trás-os-Montes, Quinta de Prados, Pole II, ECHS, Room 1.14, 5000-801, Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3927-0468

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PCIF/GRF/0050/2019Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/04928/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the growing research interest regarding the perceptions of forest-related stakeholders about forest functions and values, the views of social actors not directly involved in forestry have been largely overlooked, particularly in Southern European countries like Portugal. This article addresses this gap by analyzing the social perceptions regarding the functions of the Matas do Litoral, public-managed forests in the Centre Region of Portugal, severely impacted by the mega-fires of October 2017. Through a hierarchical cluster analysis of survey results collected from 1000 inhabitants of the adjacent parishes of the Matas, three groups were identified-"The Moderately Interested," "The Comprehensively Interested" and "The Environmentally Interested"-based on significant differences regarding their perceptions of forest functions, the future of these areas, essential factors for effective forest management, the mega-fires and their consequences. Sociodemographic characteristics-particularly age and literacy levels-forest ownership, knowledge and familiarity with these forests help to explain the differences between the three clusters.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesForestryForestsSocial PerceptionWildfiresAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPortugalPublic OpinionForest functionsForest valuesMega-fire eventsPublic-managed forestsSocial perceptions

Identifiers

PMID40459671
PMCPMC12480173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.