Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459668›Full record

ArticleChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2025

Quantum Chemistry Based Simulation of Enantioseparation on Cyclodextrin- and Polysaccharide-Based Chiral Stationary Phases.

Linda Nelles-Ziegler, Christoph Plett, Stefan Grimme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linda Nelles-ZieglerMulliken Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Clausius Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Beringstr. 4, 53115, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4608-765X
Christoph PlettMulliken Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Clausius Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Beringstr. 4, 53115, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3911-2478
Stefan GrimmeMulliken Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Clausius Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Beringstr. 4, 53115, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5844-4371

Funding

Merck KGaA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assess the capability of modern quantum chemical methods to simulate enantioseparation on chiral stationary phases (CSPs) in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) by comparing calculated and experimental elution orders (EEOs). Compared to previous studies, this work utilizes more accurate state-of-the-art density functional theory (DFT) methods combined with automated computational workflows. The proposed approach employs molecular docking, conformer sampling, and DFT refinement for final ensemble-based association free energy calculations of two diastereomeric complexes. Ten drug-type molecules were considered on two common CSPs for which various molecular models were investigated. Although the association free energies of the strongest binding motifs were rather system-dependen t ranging from about -9 to 29 kcal/mol, the differences between the two enantiomers were always only a few kcal/mol, sometimes even below 1 kcal/mol. Despite these small differences, correct determination of EEOs for all tested cyclodextrin-based CSP systems was achieved. Even for more flexible polysaccharide-based CSPs, the workflow yielded correct EEO results in 90

Indexed as

chiral HPLCcomputational chemistryDFTenantioseparationmolecular docking

Identifiers

PMID40459668
PMCPMC12258693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.