Observational studyJournal of medical systems2025
The Role of Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models in Personalized Rehabilitation Programs for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Observational Study.
Observational study in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical applications of large language models in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Generative AI and Large Language Models in Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Advancements and Novel Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Physical Therapy: A Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications Across the Patient and Client Management Model.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Intelligence without intuition: a mixed-methods pilot study on reasoning models in musculoskeletal physiotherapy for low-back pain.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in personalized rehabilitation: current applications and a SWOT analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Article
- ChatGPT as a source of surgical information: Evaluation of responses to patient questions on hallux rigidus fusion.Digital healthArticle
- A two-stage evaluation of large language models for guideline-based Q&A and draft rehabilitation planning in stroke care.Digital healthArticle
- Artificial intelligence applications in knee osteoarthritis research: A bibliometric and visualized analysis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLarge language models (LLMs) can contribute to treatment options and outcomes by assisting physiotherapists for conditions like osteoarthritis.
aimsThe objective of this early-stage cross-sectional study is to assess the alignment of large language models with physiotherapists in designing physiotherapy and rehabilitation programs for knee osteoarthritis.
methodsForty patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were assessed using standardized clinical criteria. For each patient, individualized rehabilitation programs were created by three physiotherapists and by ChatGPT-4o and Gemini Advanced using structured prompts. The presence or absence of 50 clinically relevant rehabilitation parameters was recorded for each program. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate agreement rates between the LLMs and the physiotherapist-generated Consensus programs.
resultsChatGPT-4o achieved a 74% agreement rate with the physiotherapists' Consensus programs, while Gemini Advanced achieved 70%. Although both models showed high compatibility with general rehabilitation components, they demonstrated notable limitations in exercise specificity, including frequency, sets, and progression criteria. ChatGPT-4o performed as well as or better than Gemini in most phases, particularly in Phase 3, while Gemini showed lower consistency in balance and stabilization parameters.
conclusionsChatGPT-4o and Gemini Advanced demonstrate promising potential in generating personalized rehabilitation programs for knee osteoarthritis. While their outputs generally align with expert recommendations, notable gaps remain in clinical reasoning and the provision of detailed exercise parameters. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing model refinement and the necessity of expert supervision for safe and effective clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.