Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459660›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical systems2025

The Role of Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models in Personalized Rehabilitation Programs for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Observational Study.

Ömer Alperen Gürses, Anıl Özüdoğru, Figen Tuncay, Caner Kararti

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ömer Alperen GürsesSchool of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Merkez, Kırşehir, 40100, Türkiye. omeralperengurses@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6564-7428
Anıl ÖzüdoğruSchool of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Merkez, Kırşehir, 40100, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-9863
Figen TuncayFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Merkez, Kırşehir, 40100, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0886-2006
Caner KarartiSchool of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Merkez, Kırşehir, 40100, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4655-0986

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge language models (LLMs) can contribute to treatment options and outcomes by assisting physiotherapists for conditions like osteoarthritis.

aimsThe objective of this early-stage cross-sectional study is to assess the alignment of large language models with physiotherapists in designing physiotherapy and rehabilitation programs for knee osteoarthritis.

methodsForty patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were assessed using standardized clinical criteria. For each patient, individualized rehabilitation programs were created by three physiotherapists and by ChatGPT-4o and Gemini Advanced using structured prompts. The presence or absence of 50 clinically relevant rehabilitation parameters was recorded for each program. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate agreement rates between the LLMs and the physiotherapist-generated Consensus programs.

resultsChatGPT-4o achieved a 74% agreement rate with the physiotherapists' Consensus programs, while Gemini Advanced achieved 70%. Although both models showed high compatibility with general rehabilitation components, they demonstrated notable limitations in exercise specificity, including frequency, sets, and progression criteria. ChatGPT-4o performed as well as or better than Gemini in most phases, particularly in Phase 3, while Gemini showed lower consistency in balance and stabilization parameters.

conclusionsChatGPT-4o and Gemini Advanced demonstrate promising potential in generating personalized rehabilitation programs for knee osteoarthritis. While their outputs generally align with expert recommendations, notable gaps remain in clinical reasoning and the provision of detailed exercise parameters. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing model refinement and the necessity of expert supervision for safe and effective clinical integration.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceOsteoarthritis, KneePhysical Therapy ModalitiesPrecision MedicineAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLarge Language ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPhysical TherapistsArtificial intelligenceKnee osteoarthritisLarge language modelsPhysiotherapyRehabilitation program

Identifiers

PMID40459660
PMCPMC12134017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.