ArticleBlood research2025
Impact of HLA locus mismatch on peripheral blood allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors using an ATG-based GVHD prophylaxis strategy.
Article in Blood research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an important treatment option for hematologic diseases. However, limited studies have evaluated the prognosis of patients receiving single human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatched unrelated donor allo-HSCT (HLA 9/10 MMUD-HSCT) compared to those receiving fully matched unrelated donor allo-HSCT (10/10 MUD-HSCT). This study retrospectively analyzed 126 cases of unrelated donor allo-HSCT (URD-HSCT) at our center, in which anti-human thymocyte globulin (ATG, 7.5 mg/kg) was used as a graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis strategy. The MUD-HSCT group had a significantly lower incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (13.89% vs. 35.19% in the MMUD-HSCT group, p = 0.005). In contrast, the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD) did not differ significantly between the two groups (16.67% vs. 29.63%, p = 0.083). The median follow-up time was 16.98 months (range: 7.88-38.55). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (p = 0.707), 3-year CIR (p = 0.764), 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.954), 3-year DFS (p = 0.888), 1-year overall survival (OS) (p = 0.611), 3-year OS (p = 0.796), 3-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) (p = 0.711), or GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) (p = 0.546). The estimated median OS and DFS times were not reached in either group. In conclusion, under an ATG-based GVHD prophylaxis regimen, HLA 9/10 MMUD-HSCT is a viable alternative donor option, offering comparable clinical outcomes to those of fully matched unrelated donor HSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.