ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2025
Mitogenomic evidence for the monophyly of blackcurrant gall mite subfamily Cecidophyinae (Eriophyoidea, Eriophyidae).
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Superfamily Eriophyoidea is a group of highly miniaturized and host-specific phytophagous acariform mites closely related to the soil-dwelling nematalycid mites. Limited number of reliable morphological characters, multiple homoplasies, and numerous cryptic species impede systematics of this group. Most recent multigene phylogenies of Eriophyoidea suffer from incomplete sampling, inclusion of erroneous sequences, and unreliable alignments resulting in biologically inconsistent results. In this study, we obtained five new mitogenomes of eriophyoids and reanalyzed the mitogenomic dataset by Zhang et al. (2024) in order to test their conclusion on the polyphyly of the subfamily Cecidophyinae. We found out that it was based on the wrong identification of the phyllocoptine sequence OQ615736 as a cecidophyine taxon. Our analysis showed that a group of seven mitogenomic sequences assigned to cecidophyine genera Cecidophyes, Cecidophyopsis, Coptophylla, Cosetacus, and Glyptacus form a monophyletic group, which was itself divided into two clades corresponding to previously recognized tribes Colomerini and Cecidophyini. However, no mitochondrial gene clusters unique to Cecidophyinae were found. Gene order variability in Cecidophyinae is low and concerns only positions of the control region and tRNA genes trnC and trnI. Analysis of nucleotide diversity showed that three mitochondrial protein coding genes (COX1, COX3 and CYTB) are promising molecular markers for future eriophyoid studies, whereas genes ATP8, NAD4L, NAD5, NAD6 are hypervariable and should be used with caution or even excluded (ATP8) from multigene phylogenetic analyses. Finally, we identified numerous sequences of Eriophyoidea in GenBank with incorrect taxonomic affinities, underscoring the urgent need for a comprehensive revision of all eriophyoid mite sequences deposited in public databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40459610What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.