Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459593›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

Oncologic pitfalls and mimics in the abdomen and pelvis.

Nicole V Warrington, Anup Shetty, Matthew T Heller, Cole Thompson, Nelly Tan, Khaled M Elsayes, Margarita Revzin, Maria Zulfiqar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicole V WarringtonMayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Anup ShettyMallinckrodt (United States), Hazelwood, USA.
Matthew T HellerMayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Cole ThompsonMayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Nelly TanMayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Khaled M ElsayesThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Margarita RevzinYale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, USA.
Maria ZulfiqarMayo Clinic, Rochester, USA. zulfiqar.maria@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncological imaging in the abdomen and pelvis can be complex. Several imaging pitfalls and mimics of oncology can create diagnostic uncertainty. A pitfall is a malignancy that is missed, either not visualized or misdiagnosed as a benign finding. A mimic is a benign entity that is misinterpreted as malignancy. This article will provide a case-based review with teaching tips to avoid various oncologic pitfalls and mimics in the abdomen and pelvis. The categories of pitfalls to be reviewed include spontaneous regression of primary malignancy, neoplasms resembling benign entities, eye-catching benign pathology with superimposed malignancy, false negative tumor markers, infiltrative malignancy, nuances with disease progression, and concomitant complications. The categories of mimics to be reviewed include benign neoplasms with aggressive growth pattern, benign entities with malignancy appearing enhancement patterns, infectious/inflammatory conditions, iatrogenic/foreign body reactions, and anatomic structures. Insight regarding certain pitfalls and mimics can help the radiologist improve diagnostic precision.

Indexed as

Abdominal NeoplasmsDiagnostic ErrorsPelvic NeoplasmsAbdomenDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansPelvisDiagnostic errorsImaging mimicsImaging pitfallsNeoplasmsOncological imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.