SynthesisArchives of dermatological research2025
Keloids and hypertrophic scars in individuals with darker Fitzpatrick skin types: a systematic review of treatment efficacy and quality of life outcomes.
Synthesis in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Surgical Excision with Adjuvant Therapies in the Management of Keloids: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Transcriptome-guided development of a fibrosis-reversal compound reduces skin scarring and allows regeneration via mitochondrial uncoupling.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Partners, Pride, and Prevention: Scaling Mpox Vaccination Access Across Minnesota.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Exploration of novel therapeutic targets for keloids based on clinical and molecular data: the role of the IL-4/IL-13 signaling pathway.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceKeloids and hypertrophic scars (HTS) can cause physical discomfort and- psychosocial distress, especially in individuals with darker Fitzpatrick skin types. These scars often recur and may lead to itching, pigmentation changes, pain, and reduced self-esteem.
objectiveTo examine how keloids and HTS affect quality of life (QoL) in darker-skinned populations and to evaluate treatment strategies that may improve both scar outcomes and QoL. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We conducted a systematic review in April 2024 using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Two independent reviewers screened studies based on predetermined criteria, with a third resolving discrepancies. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) scale
findingsFrom 132 initial publications, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. Surgical excision followed by brachytherapy showed recurrence rates of about 3.1% for keloids. Combining silicone gel sheeting, intralesional corticosteroids, laser therapy, and pressure therapy was generally more effective for HTS. While only a few studies included formal QoL assessments, improvements in pain, pruritus, and overall patient satisfaction were reported. Notably, darker Fitzpatrick skin types were underrepresented in existing scar severity scales, pointing to a gap in tailored outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Treatments such as surgical excision followed by brachytherapy appear promising for keloids, and multimodal approaches may yield better outcomes for HTS. However, potential side effects like hyperpigmentation must be considered. More inclusive research with standardized QoL measures is needed to clarify how these interventions influence both scar resolution and overall well-being in darker-skinned populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40459590What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.