Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459495›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Genetic Spectrum and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in a Chinese Cohort With Nanophthalmos With Secondary Angle-Closure Glaucoma.

Xiaowei Yu, Hanxue Zhao, Yan Gao, Tao Zhou, Lin Deng, Miao Zhang, Hongyu Zhong, Feng Mei, Zhijun Li, Longyan Sun and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Xiaowei YuBeijing Tongren Eye Center Research Ward, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hanxue ZhaoBeijing Tongren Eye Center Research Ward, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yan GaoBeijing Tongren Eye Center Research Ward, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tao ZhouBeijing Tongren Eye Center Research Ward, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lin DengBeijing Tongren Eye Center Research Ward, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Miao ZhangBeijing Tongren Eye Center Research Ward, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hongyu ZhongBeijing Tongren Eye Center Research Ward, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Feng MeiBeijing Tongren Eye Center Research Ward, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhijun LiBeijing Tongren Eye Center Research Ward, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Longyan SunBeijing Tongren Eye Center Research Ward, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tianrui ZhangBeijing Tongren Eye Center Research Ward, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yan ShiBeijing Tongren Eye Center Research Ward, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhigang FanBeijing Tongren Eye Center Research Ward, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the genetic and clinical features of nanophthalmos with secondary angle-closure glaucoma (NSACG) in a Chinese cohort. This was a prospective cross-sectional study of 157 eyes from 88 Chinese patients with NSACG. Methods: The participants underwent ocular and systemic examinations and whole-exome sequencing. The main outcome measures were pathogenic genetic variants, axial length (AL), refractive spherical equivalent (SE), vitreous chamber depth (VCD), white-to-white (WTW), radius of corneal curvature (flat and steep K: K1 and K2), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens vault (LV), lens thickness (LT), extent of angle closure, anterior segment crowding value, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, central subfield thickness (CST) in macular, cup-to-disc ratio (C/D), mean defect in visual field, and onset age of angle-closure glaucoma (ACG). Results: Seventy-eight variants (51.14%) were identified in 45 patients, including 20 in PRSS56 (44.44%) and 14 in MFRP (31.11%) with autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance, 8 in MYRF (17.78%), and 3 in TMEM98 (6.6%) with autosomal dominant (AD) inheritance. Individuals with genetic diagnosis were associated with shorter AL, higher SE, larger K1 and K2, shallower ACD, greater angle closure extent, larger LT/AL, shorter VCD, and higher incidence of retinal detachment. Compared with AR cases, patients with AD showed younger ACG onset, longer AL, lower SE, smaller K1 and K2, longer VCD, thinner CST of the macula, and more severe visual field defects. Conclusions: Among Chinese patients with NSACG, PRSS56 and MFRP were the predominant AR variants, whereas MYRF and TMEM98 were the main AD variants. Genetic diagnosis exhibited shorter AL and a more crowded anterior segment, leading to accelerated glaucoma progression. The faster glaucoma progression in AD cases highlights the need for early intervention.

Indexed as

Glaucoma, Angle-ClosureMicrophthalmosMutationAdultAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleExome SequencingFemaleGenetic Association StudiesHumansHyperopiaIntraocular PressureMaleMembrane ProteinsMembrane ProteinsPRSS56 protein, humanSerine Proteases

Identifiers

PMID40459495
PMCPMC12136104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.