ArticleHealth promotion international2025
The impact of Covid-19 on food aid systems in South Africa: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Covid-19 and South Africa's response to Covid-19 resulted in increased food insecurity and reliance on food aid. This study aimed to describe the functioning of the food aid system during South Africa's Covid-19 response. We conducted a mixed-methods study from August 2020 to January 2021 in South Africa. Data collection comprised of a desk-based review of private actor activities related to food aid during Covid-19; key informant interviews with food aid providers in both civil society and government, informal traders, and academia (n = 20); and a survey with HIV-positive women (n = 202). Interviews were transcribed and inductively coded. Data were analysed qualitatively using thematic analysis. Results showed that Covid-19, and the response, caused disruptions to food supply, specifically informal food economy and reduced incomes, resulting in increased reliance on food aid. While food donations increased, this did not meet increased demand for aid. Recipients of food aid reported low access to food aid and a mismatch between the contents of food aid parcels and their needs, despite aid providers outlining policies that considered nutritional and cultural acceptability of food parcels. Many participants indicated a preference for a food voucher or grant over food parcels. The paper highlights the unintended adverse consequences of the Covid-19 response on food insecurity. South Africa's food aid system was insufficient to respond to the needs of vulnerable groups during the pandemic. We recommend ongoing monitoring of interventions to identify and mitigate unintended consequences and the implementation of a food voucher system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.