ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Exercise Restriction Does Not Change Outcome in Dogs After Diagnosis of Acute Non-Compressive Nucleus Pulposus Extrusion, Fibrocartilaginous Embolism, or Hydrated Nucleus Pulposus Extrusion.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute hydrated nucleus pulposus extrusion in dogs with severe neurologic status: comparison between conservative and surgical treatment.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute non-compressive nucleus pulposus extrusion (ANNPE), fibrocartilaginous embolism (FCE), and hydrated nucleus pulposus extrusion (HNPE) all present with acute to peracute onset of myelopathic signs in dogs, for which treatment usually is medical. Conservative management including a period of strict rest usually is recommended because of concern about relapse if immediate exercise is allowed. HYPOTHESES: Allowing exercise after a diagnosis of ANNPE, FCE, or HNPE does not decrease the chance of recovery or predispose to relapse in the short-term follow-up period (4 weeks) after discharge. There is no difference in clinical outcome between rested and exercised groups. ANIMALS: Forty cases of ANNPE, FCE, or HNPE with follow-up including at minimum a 4-week evaluation after discharge.
methodsRetrospective study. The exercise group (n = 22) included all dogs the owners of which were not explicitly instructed to rest their dogs, whereas the rest group (n = 18) included all dogs the owners of which were specifically advised to rest their dogs or to restrict their exercise.
resultsNo dogs relapsed or deteriorated between discharge and 4-week re-evaluation. No significant difference was found between the rest and exercise groups.
conclusionsAllowing exercise after confirming a diagnosis of ANNPE, FCE, or HNPE did not predispose to relapse of clinical signs in the 4 weeks after discharge in our cohort, but the rest group had a higher proportion of HNPE cases, which means interpretation of our findings in this diagnosis must be made with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.